The saga of the Murdaugh household in South Carolina continues, now with a comfort retailer firm suing its legal responsibility insurers for failing to defend it in opposition to a second lawsuit stemming from the sale of beer to an underage Paul Murdaugh on a fateful evening in 2019.
The lawsuit in federal court docket in Georgia may add to the simmering debate over the excessive price of legal responsibility insurance coverage for institutions that promote alcohol in South Carolina, a value that has pushed plenty of eating places, bars and venues to shut within the final two years.
Within the criticism filed late final week, Parker’s Corp. and its principal officers cost that Amerisure Insurance coverage Co. and Utica Mutual Insurance coverage breached the insurance coverage contract by denying protection for a lawsuit filed by the property of a younger girl killed in a ship crash – a ship allegedly pushed by the underage and intoxicated son of Alex Murdaugh.
The elder Murdaugh was a well known South Carolina lawyer who was convicted in 2023 of murdering his spouse and his son, Paul, in 2021.
Insurers for Parker’s, which owned the waterfront comfort retailer that bought alcohol to Paul Murdaugh earlier than the deadly boat accident, final 12 months agreed to pay some $15 million to settle the younger girl’s household’s preliminary go well with in opposition to the shop operators. That was often known as the “boating lawsuit.”
In 2021, the property of deceased Mallory Seaside filed a second lawsuit, often known as the “outrage lawsuit,” in opposition to Parker’s, alleging that the shop firm had leaked movies, beforehand utilized in a associated mediation, of a few of the occasions that evening, together with pictures of Mallory’s physique. The photographs have been reportedly offered to a documentary filmmaker, the outrage go well with contends.
“The Outrage lawsuit additionally falsely contends that Parker’s, Mr. Parker, Mr. Greco, and Mr. D’Cruz labored with non-public investigators to launch a social media marketing campaign to inflict emotional misery on the Seaside Household ‘to decrease their resolve’ to prosecute their claims in opposition to Parker’s within the Boating Lawsuit,” Parker’s criticism in opposition to its insurers explains.
The Parkers and the others named within the outrage go well with have denied the allegations. However they are saying they nonetheless want Amerisure and Utica to defend them within the doubtlessly pricey litigation. Each business legal responsibility insurance policies offered $1 million per prevalence and an combination restrict of $2 million.
The insurers haven’t but filed a solution to the Parker lawsuit. However the criticism notes that the carriers despatched declination letters in 2022 denying the protection: Amerisure argued that the mediation video was leaked earlier than the coverage interval started and that the coverage excludes protection for claims relating to materials that was offered illegally.
Parker’s Corp. countered that the underlying outrage go well with doesn’t allege violations of the regulation, and that the date the video was leaked is just an allegation made by the Seaside household.
Utica denied protection and authorized protection on the grounds that the outrage go well with doesn’t contain bodily harm, per the phrases of the insurance coverage coverage. The coverage additionally doesn’t cowl hurt from publication of “private data,” and doesn’t cowl private and promoting harm ensuing from the publication of fabric that the insureds knew to be false, Utica mentioned, in response to the Parker criticism.
“Moreover, Utica is estopped from asserting any protection defenses not expressly included in its January 27, 2022 denial letter as a result of an insurer shouldn’t be permitted in Georgia to disclaim protection and on the identical time to order its rights later to say different bases for the protection denial,” the Parker go well with argues.
The Parker Corp., which owns comfort shops in Georgia and South Carolina, is asking the U.S. District Court docket in Northern Georgia to declare that the insurance coverage corporations should defend the shop firm within the outrage lawsuit, and to award damages to Parker’s for the insurers’ failure to defend.
The promoting of the alcohol to Paul Murdaugh, who reportedly used his older brother’s identification card, that evening in 2019 and the next insurance coverage settlement have been cited for example of how South Carolina’s “joint-and-several” legal responsibility legal guidelines have brought about insurance coverage premiums to soar, placing a number of locations out of business.
Critics have mentioned the regulation doesn’t permit apportionment of fault however lets juries pin many of the damages on defendants with the deepest pockets or finest insurance coverage protection. Though a number of different institutions bought booze to Murdaugh and buddies that evening, Parker’s retailer was going through the majority of the damages.
The South Carolina Common Meeting this 12 months didn’t approve plenty of payments, together with ones that will have repealed the joint legal responsibility regulation and others that will have offered insurance coverage swimming pools to consuming and ingesting institutions.
Matters
Lawsuits
Carriers
South Carolina
Enthusiastic about Carriers?
Get automated alerts for this matter.
