Russia seems to be on the cusp of a debilitating oil-freight transportation drawback due to US sanctions, writes Bloomberg oil strategist Julian Lee.
On Jan. 10, the US Treasury sanctioned 161 oil tankers for his or her function in transferring Russian oil. It was a part of a raft of measures towards Moscow imposed by the outgoing Biden administration that President Donald Trump has but to dial down. Certainly, there seems to be an opportunity he’ll go even tougher previous to any Ukraine peace talks.
The price of discovering a tanker to hold Russia’s flagship Urals oil to Asia has already jumped by virtually 50% for the reason that measures had been launched, in response to knowledge from Argus Media. The hole between costs when the barrels go away Russia and arrive in Asia, a proxy for supply prices, have additionally soared.
Whereas such surges occurred prior to now, there was cause on the time to be cautious of how actual they had been. For instance, inflating supply prices would have been a intelligent method of constructing it appear like exported cargoes value $60-a-barrel or much less — even when the sale value upon supply to Asia was greater.
Doing that will have certified the cargoes for entry to western companies together with tankers and insurance coverage whereas nonetheless permitting barrels to in the end be offered far above a Group of Seven value cap.
There’s no strategy to show that that sort of overstating of freight charges did or didn’t occur. There was merely a monetary incentive to do it. Likewise, there’s no method right now to show or disprove that the identical factor isn’t taking place. Certainly, the identical incentive to sport the numbers nonetheless exists.
What’s modified is the huge fleet of tankers now below sanction, and indicators that freshly blacklisted ones are beginning to get disrupted — simply as these positioned below prior measures additionally struggled for employment. It’s very attainable that Russia’s true freight prices actually are about to spiral.
There at the moment are 265 tankers blacklisted by a minimum of one of many US, EU or UK (with a US itemizing being by far essentially the most disruptive to buying and selling). Prior American measures by and enormous stopped the focused vessels from buying and selling.
The measures hit refined merchandise carriers in addition to these hauling crude.
Even so, out of 435 vessels that carried Russian crude in 2024, 112 of them, or 26%, at the moment are topic to sanctions imposed by Washington. Add within the ones focused by London and Brussels and the proportion rises to 37%.
However that understates the issue going through the Kremlin. With 80% doing repeat cargoes (and a few as many as 20), the tankers sanctioned by the US hauled 45% of all seaborne Russian crude shipments final yr. Add within the vessels hit by the UK and European Union, however not the US, and 57% of Moscow’s crude shipments had been carried on vessels that at the moment are blacklisted.
And even which may not be sufficient. Some tankers designated for transferring Iranian oil — together with two on Thursday — had additionally transported Russian barrels.
These sorts of numbers symbolize a gaping gap within the shadow fleet of tankers that Russia assembled to maneuver its oil and so they make it crucial to search out various vessels.
To be clear, Russia has to this point largely labored round prior sanctions and stored its huge export program regular. It’s this enormous quantity of oil for which it wants to search out tankers.
The web consequence is a rise in freight payments that will simply be beginning, particularly if different homeowners — beforehand chilly to the commerce — want extra incentives to take the chance of falling foul of future sanctions. It’s additionally prone to make it dearer to amass the following batch of ships to complement the shadow fleet and fill the outlet created by the sanctions.
Certainly the concept of shopping for second hand ships to type out the issue — is questionable. If you’re an middleman contemplating working with Russia, and even Russia itself, what’s the purpose of spending billions of {dollars} or dirhams on second-hand tankers, solely to see them sanctioned?
When the ‘supply unfold’ and freight prices boomed beforehand, there was nothing near the sort of restriction on tanker provide that Russia faces right now.
Russia’s obvious spot-market freight payments are already punishing, at $10 a barrel from the Black Sea to India and as a lot as $13 from the Baltic, in response to Argus.
That’s not but on the degree it reached within the weeks instantly after the introduction of the value cap — when the Baltic to India journey value greater than $20 a barrel — nevertheless it’s risen by $4.20 a barrel, or 48%, since Jan. 10.
Importantly, some sanctioned ships are already failing to ship effectively. A number of of the blacklisted ones that stay in use are simply sitting off the Russian coast, or exterior the ports in China the place they’re imagined to discharge, others are offloading into bigger vessels close to Russia for storage.
Some are en path to their locations and it will likely be attention-grabbing to see what they do as soon as they’ve delivered.
Sanctioned ships could present a supply of attainable storage vessels, however the potential for future fleet curtailment is obvious. It’s additionally questionable whether or not homeowners of vessels that aren’t blacklisted will likely be keen to gather cargoes from these which might be.
If this sort of disruption occurs at scale, with the numerous numbers of extra shadow fleet ships having been sanctioned, then Russia’s freight challenges may develop into crippling.
And historical past reveals that that could be a very actual chance.
NOTE: Julian Lee is an oil strategist who writes for Bloomberg. The observations he makes are his personal and will not be meant as funding recommendation.
{Photograph}: The Seamusic oil tanker docked on the Rosenets oil terminal close to Burgas, Bulgaria, on Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Picture credit score: Michaela Vatcheva/Bloomberg
Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.
