The 166-page doc charts the hours and closing chaotic minutes earlier than the deadly collision between a Japan Airways Co. jet and a coast guard airplane on the Tokyo airport within the early night of Jan. 2, 2024.
The crash killed 5 of the six individuals aboard the smaller airplane, which had entered the runway into the trail of the coming JAL flight. All 379 passengers and crew aboard the JAL Airbus SE A350 miraculously survived the fireball that engulfed the airplane.
Investigators have beforehand pointed to inconsistencies between the directions by air visitors controllers to the coast guard pilots, and the next actions by the cockpit crew, as the explanation for the crash. The report additionally particulars the strains of controlling visitors at one of many world’s busiest industrial airports, in addition to inadequacies with methods designed to stop the precise form of crash that occurred.
Right here’s a more in-depth take a look at what investigators have discovered up to now:
Alert Confusion
The security system that alerts air visitors controllers to potential runway collisions didn’t have an audio alarm put in, although a visible alert was functioning throughout a number of screens within the tower.
At Haneda, the alert is triggered when a departing plane is within the path of a jet as a consequence of land in 48 seconds or extra. However investigators say that it may very well be triggered when there’s no precise overlap, or in a state of affairs that doesn’t pose a security hazard. Air visitors controllers mentioned they discovered the system unreliable and, moreover, there have been no formal procedures for what to do as soon as an alert was triggered, the report discovered.
The report mentioned the protection system was working usually on the day of the crash and was triggered at 5:46 p.m. native time — lower than two minutes earlier than the collision — as a result of runway incursion by the coast guard airplane. Employees within the management tower have been visually checking the motion of plane and none recalled seeing the alert on their screens.
Congestion
The night hours are among the busiest at Haneda Airport and air visitors controllers have been juggling congestion. The employee overseeing runway 34, the place the crash occurred, was supervising 5 plane — three departing and two touchdown — in addition to visually monitoring two different jets on a distinct runway.
The airport is staffed by air visitors controllers from the Tokyo Aerodrome Management Heart and the Tokyo Terminal Air Site visitors Management Heart, who take turns performing management duties. On the time of the accident, there have been 12 air visitors controllers on responsibility on the Tokyo Aerodrome Management Heart.
Investigators are trying into the workload of the controller supervising the actions of the planes concerned within the collision. Within the wake of the incident, the union for transport employees in Japan mentioned it’ll push for more staff to help air visitors controllers on the nation’s essential airports to strengthen security measures.
Regardless, the heavy congestion at such a busy time of day created a way of urgency to get plane shifting. The controller overseeing runway 34 had already rejected a number of requests to hurry up landings, citing the various jets ready to take-off in a brief time period.
The coast guard pilots have been significantly harried. They have been set to supply provides to victims of a deadly earthquake that struck northwestern Japan on Jan. 1, 2024, however had confronted mechanical points that delayed their departure.
Confusion about whether or not they had been given precedence to take off led to the coast guard airplane being within the path of the coming JAL jet, the report mentioned.
Energy Issues
The coast guard mission had its flight pushed again by about 40 minutes as a consequence of an issue with the De Havilland Canada Sprint 8’s auxiliary energy unit.
That left the crew scrambling to troubleshoot — doubtlessly changing the half or looking for help from airports alongside its multi-stop route. The day had began with a plan to make use of a completely totally different jet for the operation. The choice to make use of the De Havilland, which was able to carrying extra cargo, then introduced a problem of being short-staffed for that sort of jet.
The mechanical downside was nonetheless being mentioned because the coast guard airplane taxied towards the runway, based on the cockpit voice recorder, which minimize out at 5:47 p.m. — when the JAL jet struck the smaller airplane.
Investigators are persevering with their probe and haven’t given particulars on when a closing report will probably be printed.
{Photograph}: The wreckage of a Japan Airways passenger jet that collided with a Japan Coast Guard airplane at Haneda Airport, on Jan. 5, 2024. Photograph credit score: Akio Kon/Bloomberg
Associated:
Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.
An important insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.
Get the insurance coverage trade’s trusted e-newsletter
