By
January 22, 2025
Gadgets generally known as pedestrian hybrid beacons (PHBs) enable walkers who must cross a busy highway to primarily conjure up a stoplight by urgent a button. However whereas the gadgets are nice at getting drivers to yield, many pedestrians don’t hassle to activate them earlier than crossing, a brand new examine from the Insurance coverage Institute for Freeway Security exhibits.
In distinction, pedestrians usually tend to activate rectangular fast flashing beacons (RRFBs), regardless that they’re much less efficient at getting drivers to cease.
A key distinction between the gadgets is that an RRFB instructs drivers to yield as quickly as a pedestrian presses the button, whereas a PHB cycles by two yellow warning phases earlier than it indicators drivers to cease. Pedestrians seem extra prepared to activate slower-acting PHBs when the highway is extensive, visitors is heavy, or the automobiles are zooming previous at greater speeds, IIHS researchers discovered.
“It’s well-documented that each of those widespread pedestrian warning indicators make drivers extra more likely to yield and permit walkers to cross the road safely,” IIHS President David Harkey stated. “However they will solely try this if pedestrians push the button to activate them. This examine presents invaluable classes for the way we will make that extra doubtless.”
RRFBs are yellow LEDs mounted to pedestrian or bicycle crossing indicators that flash intermittently when activated by an individual trying to cross. They start flashing instantly, and the pedestrian can cross as quickly as they really feel it’s secure to take action.
PHBs encompass two crimson lights organized horizontally above a single yellow one. When a pedestrian presses the button, the yellow mild flashes after which stays lit for a brief interval earlier than each crimson lights come on for the drivers and a stroll sign is exhibited to the ready pedestrian. Driving by the sign at that time is tantamount to working an ordinary stoplight. After one other interval, the crimson lights start flashing, signaling to drivers that they will proceed by the crosswalk if there aren’t any pedestrians nonetheless within the roadway.
Levels of a pedestrian hybrid beacon
Earlier analysis has proven that each gadgets cut back pedestrian crashes. Nonetheless, few research have examined how real-world pedestrians use them. As an alternative, most give attention to how efficient they’re at getting drivers to yield when activated.
So as to add extra element to the image, the IIHS examine investigated yield charges and activation charges for the 2 kinds of beacons by video observations of greater than 3,000 pedestrians crossing at varied areas in North Carolina. Researchers additionally carried out a survey of 343 pedestrians who had been noticed crossing.
Typically, no matter the kind of pedestrian sign used, activation charges elevated and yielding charges decreased with greater velocity limits and when visitors was heavy.
At areas the place PHBs had been deployed, drivers had been greater than twice as more likely to yield to pedestrians when the lights had been crimson as when the system was not activated, the researchers discovered. Nonetheless, fewer than two-thirds of the folks crossing at these areas selected to activate the sign.
At areas with RRFBs, drivers had been about 80% extra more likely to yield when the lights had been flashing than after they weren’t activated, however 4 out of 5 pedestrians selected to press the button.
Ready instances had been additionally 52% shorter for pedestrians in search of to cross at activated RRFBs than for these crossing at activated PHBs. Delays had been doubtless longer for the PHBs as a result of they cycle by two yellow warning durations earlier than altering to crimson and giving the stroll sign. In distinction, RRFBs start flashing instantly and permit pedestrians to cross as quickly as they really feel it’s secure.
The commonest causes that survey respondents gave for activating both kind of sign had been that visitors was heavy or fast-moving or that the highway was extensive. The observational examine additionally confirmed that activation charges elevated considerably beneath these situations.
“It is sensible that pedestrians don’t need to wait in the event that they suppose they will get throughout the highway safely,” stated Raul Avelar, IIHS senior analysis transportation engineer and lead creator of the examine. “Meaning pedestrian hybrid beacons, which drivers usually tend to deal with like a crimson mild at an everyday visitors sign, could also be simpler on the hairiest crossings, the place pedestrians are extra doubtless to make use of them. RRFBs ought to be put in at much less difficult crossings, similar to two-lane roads, the place visitors is comparatively mild, or the place velocity limits are decrease.”
Different components additionally influenced activation and yielding charges.
Pedestrians had been a lot much less more likely to activate beacons in areas the place the far facet of the crossing was lacking a sidewalk, for instance. Which will have been as a result of the dearth of an outlined vacation spot level resulted in additional pedestrians crossing outdoors the crosswalk. Alternatively, activation was extra widespread at school zones, at midblock areas, in periods with extra visitors and when teams of pedestrians had been crossing.
Drivers had been extra susceptible to yield at areas with a refuge island for pedestrians, at school zones and when teams of pedestrians had been crossing. Nonetheless, whereas activation charges had been greater throughout heavy visitors instances, yielding was extra widespread in periods of comparatively low visitors.
