Johnson & Johnson advised a decide its $9 billion proposal to settle child powder most cancers claims in chapter court docket is the one viable strategy to finish greater than 15 years of litigation, whereas opponents assailed the corporate’s efforts to line up help for its plan as deeply flawed.
“Time is off the essence,” J&J’s lawyer, Alli Brown, stated Friday in her closing argument to win approval of the plan that might resolve tens of hundreds of lawsuits alleging that asbestos-tainted talc in its iconic product has sickened customers.
Girls affected by ovarian and different cancers are dying each day, Brown stated. Typical personal-injury mass litigation “has proven us it’s not a strategy to get a well timed decision.”
A lawyer for opponents of the plan stated most cancers victims “weren’t handled pretty and impartially” in a pre-bankruptcy vote held final yr to gauge help for J&J’s settlement provide.
“There have been severe lapses right here that justify having a re-vote,” legal professional Adam Silverstein advised US Chapter Choose Christopher Lopez on the shut of a trial in Houston. “It was a chaotic course of that shouldn’t be endorsed.”
Johnson & Johnson is attempting to make use of the chapter course of to shut out the huge child powder litigation after two earlier efforts failed in different courts. Lopez is navigating the intricacies of the regulation to find out whether or not J&J’s efforts are correct.
Lopez heard about two weeks of testimony about whether or not J&J manipulated the pre-bankruptcy vote on the settlement and whether or not the corporate, which is worthwhile, is wrongly attempting to learn from Chapter 11 guidelines that must be reserved for financially distressed companies.
Objectors contend J&J made false and deceptive statements in disclosures of the chapter plan about whether or not J&J’s talc-based child powder was ever tainted with asbestos. Brown contested that through the trial, saying the corporate had “by no means wavered within the opinion that this product is protected and doesn’t include asbestos.”
J&J says greater than 80% of claimants voted to again the settlement and the corporate based mostly its Pink River Talc unit’s fast-track chapter case on that help. The corporate’s attorneys stated J&J clearly laid out the phrases of its provides to present and future claimants and correctly carried out the vote final summer season.
The corporate’s chapter plan would pay a mean of $120,000 to ovarian most cancers claimants. Supporters of the provide say that’s greater than ladies have gotten by means of circumstances within the common tort system.
Objectors’ complaints concerning the vote “merely aren’t credible” causes to invalidate the balloting, Brown stated. J&J maintains that it will take 6,000 years to attempt all pending child powder circumstances. The corporate pulled the talc-based model of the product worldwide in 2023.
Whereas most distinguished mass-tort attorneys dealing with greater than 60,000 child powder fits filed up to now favor the deal, a handful need Lopez to reject it. Opponents say J&J is wrongly attempting as soon as once more to make use of Chapter 11 to resolve the circumstances and improperly engineered the vote to push its settlement plan.
Silverstein advised the decide J&J’s dealing with of the vote “wasn’t kosher.” Foes of the plan say there have been a sequence of miscues by the corporate employed to deal with the balloting, together with switching votes opposing the plan to the supporting column.
For his half, Lopez – who has dealt with a number of circumstances involving pre-bankruptcy votes – stated he’d “by no means seen a swap of votes” in pre-packaged bankruptcies, however wasn’t able to sanction J&J over it.
The chapter case is Pink River Talc LLC, 24-90505, US Chapter Courtroom for the Southern District of Texas (Houston).
Picture: Picture by Justin Sullivan/Getty Photographs
Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.
A very powerful insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.
Get the insurance coverage trade’s trusted e-newsletter
