HELENA, Mont. — As Republican legislative leaders in Montana girded for this yr’s battle over whether or not to increase Medicaid enlargement within the state, they took intention at one of many program’s largest backers: hospitals.
If Montana’s hospitals needed to increase the federal government medical insurance program that cost taxpayers about $1 billion in 2024, and profit from that income, they need to give one thing again, similar to further group well being care providers and advantages, GOP leaders argued because the session started in January.
However as an alternative, they discovered simply how formidable a political power the state’s hospitals might be. The hospitals not solely helped steamroll Medicaid enlargement by means of the legislature, however in addition they defeated practically all makes an attempt so as to add new necessities to this system and to position new rules on hospitals themselves.
Hospitals opposed and defeated payments to impose price caps and to prominently post their charges and killed an try to redirect Medicaid funds raised by a hospital tax.
Most Montana hospitals are nonprofit organizations which can be largely exempt from state revenue and property taxes. Legislators requested drafts of a number of payments to scrutinize hospitals’ “group advantages,” the providers they supply without spending a dime or at discounted prices that justify their nonprofit standing, however didn’t introduce them through the session.
The only such bill introduced has been considerably amended, on the hospitals’ request.
The state hospital lobbyists’ political pull has annoyed conservative lawmakers in management positions who’re searching for extra oversight of and transparency from the hospitals.
“Hospitals don’t appear to wish to come to the desk to debate something, whether or not it’s transparency, controlling prices, or offering extra info to the general public on providers,” stated Republican state Sen. Greg Hertz, who sponsored the price-cap invoice that was rejected on the Senate ground this month.
Hospitals say they’re prepared to debate methods to enhance well being care in Montana, they usually level to Medicaid enlargement as a program whose advantages circulate to all corners of the state.
But with regards to rules they regard as onerous or criticism that they’re uncooperative companions on well being care coverage, the hospitals aren’t shy about pushing again.
“I don’t suppose I’ve ever been approached by any of them on reforming the well being care system,” Montana Hospital Affiliation president and CEO Bob Olsen stated of the hospitals’ critics within the legislature. “I believe that we’ve demonstrated that we work on every kind of well being insurance policies.”
Republicans maintain large majorities this legislative session and their conservative leaders — most of whom opposed extending Medicaid enlargement — have typically seen hospitals as a political foe.
However Montana’s hospitals have all the time been a powerful foyer within the state, with bipartisan enchantment. The state’s 63 hospitals make use of about 30,000 folks, based on the MHA, together with lots of the state’s physicians, and have a number of lobbyists on the Capitol, each on their very own and thru the hospital affiliation.
In addition they have a powerful ally in state Rep. Ed Buttrey, a average Republican who is also on the board of directors of Benefis Well being System. Buttrey sponsored the unique 2015 Montana Medicaid expansion bill and payments to resume this system in 2019 and this year.
Previously yr, hospitals labored to type a coalition with companies, well being clinics, doctor teams, insurers, and advocates for folks with low incomes to push for extension of Medicaid enlargement, which offers authorities well being protection to about 74,500 low-income, nondisabled Montanans.
Medicaid enlargement had been set to run out this June, however the invoice extending it breezed by means of the legislature, passing by snug margins in February, with bipartisan help. Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte signed it into legislation final month.
The MHA has a political motion committee that donates to a number of lawmakers of each events. In 2024, it paid explicit consideration to allies of Medicaid enlargement.
The PAC gave $61,000 to the Montana Democratic Social gathering and $75,000 to a political committee that supported average Republicans in contested GOP legislative primaries final June, based on filings with the state commissioner of political practices.
The majorities that passed Medicaid expansion in February included each Democrat within the legislature and lots of the average Republicans supported by the political committee financed partly by the MHA.
Democrats even have been voting virtually universally towards payments that might impose new rules on hospitals.
Hertz’s invoice, which might have capped bigger hospitals’ costs at 300% of the Medicare charge for many procedures, failed on the Senate ground this month on a 26-24 vote. All however one Democrat and 9 Republicans voted towards it.
State Sen. Cora Neumann, a Democratic member of the Senate Public Well being, Welfare and Security Committee, additionally voted towards a invoice requiring nonprofit hospitals to point out that their group advantages meet or exceed the worth of their property tax exemptions.
Neumann stated she helps higher entry to reasonably priced care in Montana however that “the insurance policies we now have been offered with aren’t properly thought out and lift issues for me about authorities overreach.”
State Rep. Jane Gillette, a Republican who chaired the legislative panel overseeing well being care spending within the state finances, tried final month to redirect a small portion of Medicaid enlargement funds — $7 million a yr — to sure hospitals. The cash is a part of $365 million generated yearly by a tax on hospital providers, and the corresponding federal match, based on Olsen, the hospital affiliation chief.
Half of the $7 million would go to smaller, unbiased hospitals and the opposite half could be distributed to hospitals displaying “distinctive well being outcomes and efficiencies,” she stated.
The Home Appropriations Committee agreed March 24 to insert her proposals into the session’s foremost finances invoice.
However every week later — after hospitals lobbied towards the change — the identical committee torpedoed language in a separate invoice that might have carried out the adjustments. The following day, on the Home ground, all however one Democrat and 25 Republicans formed a two-thirds majority to take away the funding change from the finances invoice.
“That tells you what a stronghold the hospitals have,” Gillette stated. “Even a slight variation to our present system will not be acceptable to them.”
Olsen stated the change would have taken cash from some bigger hospitals and moved it elsewhere, and never essentially to the smaller hospitals Gillette hoped to assist.
“She approached us, however by no means tried to work with us,” he stated. “It wasn’t going to succeed in these hospitals that she needed to succeed in.”
Senate President Matt Regier, a Republican, made a final try to insert Gillette’s modification into the state finances invoice on the Senate ground on April 17, however it was rejected on a 27-23 vote, with all 18 Democrats and 9 Republicans voting no.
Hospitals are, nonetheless, working with Regier on his community-benefit reporting measure — the last-standing invoice that may impose new rules on hospitals.
The bill says if the group advantages reported by nonprofit hospitals don’t equal or exceed the worth of their exemption from property taxes, they need to pay the distinction right into a fund that might be distributed to small, “essential entry” hospitals.
Through the invoice’s preliminary listening to April 2, Regier — a Medicaid enlargement opponent and generally sharp critic of the hospitals — stated he was open to amendments that hospitals would possibly discover acceptable.
The unique invoice cleared the Senate April 5 on a party-line, 30-18 vote, with Republicans in favor. Then, in a Home committee assembly on April 17, Republicans connected amendments that had the hospitals’ blessing and despatched the invoice to the Home ground.
The adjustments delay the legislation’s efficient date till 2027 and extra particularly outline the group advantages that should be reported and the potential property tax legal responsibility to which hospitals should match their profit.
Olsen stated the MHA will help the amended invoice.
“The reality of it’s, hospitals have all the time far exceeded the tax exemption for group advantages, on the spending they do,” he stated. “Some would possibly fall brief, now and again — however over the lengthy haul, they exceed these exemptions.”
Regier’s try to quantify the quantity and evaluate it to nonprofit hospitals’ tax exemption will not be unreasonable, Olsen stated: “I’m assured hospitals can do it.”
KFF Health News is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is among the core working packages at KFF—an unbiased supply of well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism. Study extra about KFF.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story might be republished without spending a dime (details).
