A federal choose dismissed a lawsuit by Exxon Mobil Corp. towards Arjuna Capital after a lawyer for the activist investor group vowed to not attempt to resurrect a shareholder coverage opposed by the corporate.
The choose in Fort Value, Texas, issued his order Monday hours after holding a listening to within the intently watched case over Exxon’s novel transfer to make use of the courts to maintain environmental and social investor bids out of annual conferences. The go well with was a part of a broader company pushback to the ability wielded by the US Securities and Change Fee within the vetting of shareholder proposals.
US District Decide Mark Pittman had beforehand rejected Arjuna’s request for dismissal, agreeing with Exxon’s argument that even after Arjuna’s unique proposal was pulled, there was nothing to cease the activist group from persevering with to file comparable ones. However Arjuna then “unconditionally and irrevocably” pledged to not submit comparable proposals.
“At base, the second time’s the appeal for Arjuna, as its ‘unconditional and irrevocable’ pledge ensures Exxon the offending conduct received’t recur,” the choose wrote.
On the listening to, Pittman instructed a lawyer for Arjuna that if the agency or an ally group repackages the anti-fossil gasoline proposal, “I’ll take your legislation license away.”
Learn Extra: Arjuna Lawyer’s License at Threat if Investor Revives Exxon Coverage
Publicly traded corporations usually debate the deserves of particular person proposals with the SEC, which might advise whether or not they be excluded from the poll. However critics of the method, together with Exxon, declare the SEC’s recommendation can differ extensively relying which administration is in workplace.
Exxon welcomed Arjuna’s pledge to not submit comparable proposals sooner or later.
“We’ve heard lots about shareholder rights, and our go well with has at all times been about preserving these rights as a result of shareholder democracy is just as sturdy as the principles that govern it,” Chairman and Chief Government Officer Darren Woods mentioned in a press release. “Making repeated proposals that garner a small minority of help doesn’t serve anybody’s curiosity besides the proponent’s.”
Exxon’s extremely uncommon determination to hunt authorized judgment relatively than undergo the SEC was seen as a take a look at of companies’ potential to close down activist investor proposals they don’t like.
Arjuna had argued that Exxon was utilizing the lawsuit to “battle a proxy conflict” with the securities regulator.
However the US Chamber of Commerce and the Enterprise Roundtable backed Exxon in a February court docket submitting. The enterprise commerce teams mentioned the SEC’s determination to permit “shareholder proposals pushing social and political agendas” allows “a subset of activists to commandeer company proxy statements for their very own parochial ends.” This takes time away from “real proposals” and wastes firm cash printing and distributing the activist proposals, they mentioned.
“As Exxon and amicus be aware, the pattern of shareholder activism on this nation isn’t going wherever,” the choose wrote Monday. “The SEC is behind the ball on this difficulty. However the court docket can not advise Exxon of its rights with no reside case or controversy to set off jurisdiction.”
The case is Exxon Mobil Company v. Arjuna Capital, LLC, 24-cv-00069, US District Courtroom, Northern District of Texas (Fort Value).
Copyright 2024 Bloomberg.
Subjects
Lawsuits
Legislation
Eager about Lawsuits?
Get computerized alerts for this matter.
