Earlier than daybreak on Oct. 18, 2017, FBI brokers broke down the entrance door of Trina Martin’s Atlanta house, stormed into her bed room and pointed weapons at her and her then-boyfriend as her 7-year-old son screamed for his mother from one other room.
Martin, blocked from comforting her son, cowered in disbelief for what she mentioned felt like an eternity. However inside minutes, the ordeal was over. The brokers realized they’d the incorrect home.
On Tuesday, an lawyer for Martin will go earlier than the U.S. Supreme Courtroom to ask the justices to reinstate her 2019 lawsuit towards the U.S. authorities accusing the brokers of assault and battery, false arrest and different violations.
A federal choose in Atlanta dismissed the go well with in 2022 and the eleventh U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals upheld that call final 12 months. The Supreme Courtroom agreed in January to take up the matter.
The important thing subject earlier than the justices is underneath what circumstances individuals can sue the federal authorities in an effort to carry legislation enforcement accountable. Martin’s attorneys say Congress clearly allowed for these lawsuits in 1974, after a pair of legislation enforcement raids on incorrect homes made headlines, and blocking them would go away little recourse for households like her.
FBI Atlanta spokesperson Tony Thomas mentioned in an electronic mail the company can’t touch upon pending litigation. However legal professionals for the federal government argued in Martin’s case that courts shouldn’t be “second-guessing” legislation enforcement selections. The FBI brokers did advance work and tried to seek out the suitable home, making this raid basically totally different from the no-knock, warrantless raids that led Congress to behave within the Nineteen Seventies, the Justice Division mentioned in courtroom filings beginning underneath the Biden administration.
In dismissing Martin’s case, the eleventh Circuit largely agreed with that argument, saying courts can’t second-guess law enforcement officials who make “trustworthy errors” in searches. The agent who led the raid mentioned his private GPS led him to the incorrect place. The FBI was on the lookout for a suspected gang member just a few homes away.
Martin, 46, mentioned she, her then-boyfriend, Toi Cliatt, and her son have been left traumatized.
“We’ll by no means be the identical, mentally, emotionally, psychologically,” she mentioned Friday on the neat, stucco house that was raided. “Mentally, you’ll be able to suppress it, however you’ll be able to’t actually recover from it.”
She and Cliatt identified the place they have been sleeping when the brokers broke in and the grasp toilet closet the place they hid.
Martin stopped teaching observe as a result of the beginning pistol reminded her of the flashbang grenade the brokers set off. Cliatt, 54, mentioned he couldn’t sleep, forcing him to depart his truck driving job.
“The street is hypnotizing,” he mentioned of driving drained. “I turned a legal responsibility to my firm.”
Martin mentioned her son turned extraordinarily anxious, pulling threads out of his garments and peeling paint off partitions.
Cliatt initially thought the raid was a housebreaking try, so he ran towards the closet, the place he saved a shotgun. Martin mentioned her son nonetheless expresses concern that she might have died had she confronted the brokers whereas armed.
“If the Federal Tort Claims Act gives a reason behind motion for something, it’s a wrong-house raid just like the one the FBI carried out right here,” Martin’s legal professionals wrote in a short to the Supreme Courtroom.
Different U.S. appeals courts have interpreted the legislation extra favorably for victims of mistaken legislation enforcement raids, creating conflicting authorized requirements that solely the nation’s highest courtroom can resolve, they are saying. Public-interest teams throughout the ideological spectrum have urged the Supreme Courtroom to overturn the eleventh Circuit ruling.
After breaking down the door to the home, a member of the FBI SWAT group dragged Cliatt out of the closet and put him in handcuffs.
However one of many brokers seen he didn’t have the suspect’s tattoos, in keeping with courtroom paperwork. He requested for Cliatt’s identify and deal with. Neither matched these of the suspect. The room went quiet as brokers realized they’d raided the incorrect home.
They uncuffed Cliatt and left for the proper home, the place they executed the warrant and arrested the person they have been after.
The agent main the raid returned later to apologize and go away a enterprise card with a supervisor’s identify. However the household obtained no compensation from the federal government, not even for the injury to the home, Cliatt mentioned.
Martin mentioned essentially the most harrowing a part of the raid was her son’s cries.
“Whenever you’re not in a position to shield your baby or no less than battle to guard your baby, that’s a sense that no mum or dad ever needs to really feel,” she mentioned.
Picture: Trina Martin, left, and Toi Cliatt inside the house the FBI mistakenly raided. (AP Picture/Sudhin Thanawala)
Copyright 2025 Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
